Derek Cianfrance’s Blue Valentine(2010)depicted Ryan Gosling
and Michelle Williams as a couple in marital collapse. Blue Valentine was
undeniably a film that was driven by the extremely genuine and overwrought performances
of the actors over the manoeuvrings of the plot. The Place beyond the Pines is,
however, much more of an elaborate and masterful return for Cianfrance.
Ryan Gosling plays Luke Glanton, a stunt-biker who discovers, after a brief former relationship with Romina, (Eva Mendes) that he is the
father to an infant son. Gosling’s character subsequently wants to fulfil his
paternal requirements; however, he fails to earn enough money on the right side
of the law to provide for his child and instead, turns to robbing banks. Meanwhile
Avery Cross played by Bradley Cooper, (who is also the father to an infant) is an esteemed
police officer whose endeavour to track Luke down ends up providing him with ethical problems within the police profession that even infiltrate into the bloodlines of these intrinsic central characters. The film is in the vein
of mythical tragedies and has to be understood as a drama of archetypal
consequences. At the centre of The Place beyond the Pines is a biblical and
well-worn literary idea of the sins of the father being visited upon the son.
Within these father-son threads, concepts such as fate and retribution play out
in a drama controlled by a powerful imperium of divine intervention and poetic
justice with powerful effect.
Gosling gives a particularly sincere, charismatic and
conflicted performance, however, it is Bradley Cooper that is the real revelation.
He portrays Avery’s tortured guilt with a raw understated conviction intensified by Cianfrance’s intimate shot style used with such claustrophobic effect in
Blue Valentine. Cooper essentially plays a character that is haunted by his
actions and spirals into a web of duplicity incited effectively
by Ray Liotta’s character.( Liotta incidentally, in paradigmatic slime-ball
mode.) Both Cooper and Gosling’s characters are reflections of good and bad,
however, these binary oppositions are clearly not determined by lawful ideologies and end up
becoming deliberately distorted to portray a greater moral point. In the second act of
the film, the word hero is emphasised, but the context in which the word is
used does not ring true and is consciously intended not to. Cianfrance is
allowing the audience to question both Avery’s heroism that is placed upon him in
conjunction to Glanton’s crimes. The latter may perversely resemble the acts of
a more genuinely heroic figure.
The final act of the film occurs 15 years later and deals
with the lives of the children. In a strange and archetypally contrived twist
of fate, both Luke and Avery’s sons become friends at high school and the repercussive
effect of their father’s wrongdoings end up revisiting them in the drama. Although
this act is the weaker and baggier of the films three act tragic structure, it
does actually deal with some of the moral problems created by the parents that percolate into
teenagers lives such as excessive hedonism, drink/drugs quite effectively. Drink, drugs and debauchery would seem
the more natural vices that would percolate from the threads of hereditary sin
and manifest within the boys as a sort of moral decay.
No comments:
Post a Comment